2013-12-17 RDLCOM
- Redlight Review Completed
Of course the Mother Hubbards may know a little more than is being posted above and will report "the rest of the story" when confirmed.
-------------------------------------------
The "emails" by request.
Ms. Smith- I will answer your question, NO there is no validity
to interfering with any net. 3.840 is a rag chew frequency and has been for
years, I have NEVER heard nets on that frequency. Do you approve of the
E-mail I received from W7BZI? I never heard of him till I received his false
accusations and threatening E-mail. He sounded like a nut job to me. Are
you aware that someone has thousands of recordings that get played over and
over on 3.840 of hundreds of HAMS saying everything you can imagine every
night, I mean every night and on other bands including 160m 80m 40m
and even 20m, I'm hearing them now as I'm typing you this
letter to you on 3.840. So if someone is playing recordings of me on
other frequencies I have no control over that. I did turn in my License
to you for this very reason. You or (The FCC) would not do anything about
them and the constant jamming is still going on to this day. It was my
fault I allowed them to get to me. I was very disappointed when I asked
you to reinstate my license and you would not due to the fact to much time had
lapsed. I was not told when I turned in my license of any "time
period" to get it back and you did nothing to help me even when I asked
you several times. Your response to me was I must go re-test so I did.
I was disappointed only because it was an advanced class license. I
know you could have reinstated it just as easy as it was canceled. As to
the part about encouraging others on how to operate their station it would be
the same as me trying to tell you how to do your job. I am only responsible for
my station and no one else's.
In closing I feel It's not my job to tell other Hams how to
operate there stations or what they can or can't say, and it is NOT for WA7BZI
to tell me how to operate mine. I have never written a letter to the FCC
about another Ham and never will because I know it would just be a waste of
time for us both. However, I have had to waste our time replying to
letters like this one.
Frank ******* KK6FR
On
Jan 13, 2014, at 12:46
PM,
FCCHAM wrote:
Mr. ******* – this IS Laura Smith and yes, you WILL respond to my
questions. For the record, my title is Special Counsel, Enforcement
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission. My office is located at 1270
Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325 and my
direct dial phone number is **************. Oh, and my
email is: laura.smith@fcc.gov. FCCHAM
is the publically available email box here at the Commission and I happen to be
monitoring it today.
I suppose since you surrendered your license to me – I can prove
it really is Laura Smith. Ok, here is your proof: over a year ago
you and I spoke on the phone about surrendering your license (you were angry at
the time), you followed up with an email about it indicating you wanted to
cancel the license and I had the Wireless Bureau cancel the license that day.
If you would like I would be happy to send you a certified
letter but since you just got your license back, do you really want to go down
that path all over again and end up with another open file here at the
Commission? Just answer my questions – is there any validity to the
allegations that you have been deliberately interfering with the Net? If
you wish, you may respond to my direct email box if you still feel there is
some question as to my identity.
Laura Smith
From: Frank *************************
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 1:37 PM
To: FCCHAM
Subject: Re: 3.840 Khz MALICIOUS AMATEUR RADIO ACTIVITY
Nice try, First mistake: No mention of a part 97 rule
violation, 2nd mistake No mention of a frequency in the body of the text
or the net in question. 3rd mistake Laura Smith would only respond in a
professional manner with her tittle and not in the middle of an E-mail. There
are many more mistakes so do your homework next time. Are you really that stupid?
or do you really think everyone else is?
Do yourself a favor, Go get a life.
On
Jan 13, 2014, at 8:21
AM,
FCCHAM wrote:
Mr. *********: Are you interfering with the Net? Or
worse, are you encouraging others to operate in violation of our rules by
“egging” them on and inviting “requests” for non-identifying individuals to
operate over the top of the Net? Both of those actions would constitute a
violation of the Commission’s rules.
Laura Smith
From: Frank **************
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 12:43 AM
To: ***
Cc: FCCHAM
Subject: Re: 3.840 Khz MALICIOUS AMATEUR RADIO ACTIVITY
I don't know who you think you are, But you can go piss up up a
rope. Just some "friendly advice" But I do have a suggestion
for you if you don't like what you here simply use your VFO that came with your
radio. If you have so much energy to put forth go find the "Recording
guy" or the "Jonny stocker" Or better yet sell off all your
antennas and radio equipment it sounds like you can't handle the drama…
"just some friendly advice"
On
Jan 5, 2014, at 9:24
PM, **** wrote:
January 05, 2014
AMATEUR RADIO STATION ‘KK6FR’
FRANK *********
PO BOX ********
PHELAN, CA 92329
Hey Frank… I
DON’T KNOW “WHO” YOU THINK YOU MIGHT BE, BUT HERE’S SOME FRIENLY ADVICE:
YOU
NEED TO CEASE AND DESIST NOW FROM 3840 Khz, or ANY OTHER FREQUENCY upon which
you are transmitting in violation of Part 97.
Same thing if
you’re also participating in the mess on 3908 in the interference of the WARFA
NET.
I don’t know
from where you came, but your FOUL MOUTH and diatribe on 3840 is not
appreciated by the amateur radio community.
IF YOU CAN’T
CLEAN YOUR ACT UP AND COMPLY WITH COMMON DECENCY AND MORALS AND FOLLOW THE
RULES, TAKE YOUR ANTENNAS DOWN AND GET OFF THE AIR. CHOOSE ANOTHER ‘HOBBY’. WE
DON’T WANT TO HEAR ANY MORE OF YOUR IDLE, USELESS CRAP AND CUSSING ON THE
AIRWAVES.
THE AMATEUR
RADIO COMMUNITY ISN’T GOING TO PUT UP WITH YOUR BULLSHIT ANY LONGER.
YOUR FOUL MOUTH
HAS GOTTA GO. IF YOU CAN’T BE A NORMAL LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN, FOLLOW THE RULES AND
COMMON SENSE, THEN GET THE HELL OFF THE AIR!
YOUR ‘EGGING ON’
THE MUSIC JAMMERS, BY ASKING FOR “REQUESTS” IS NOT ONLY ABERRANT, IT MEANS THAT
YOU FRANK HAVE A FEW SCREWS LOOSE AND ARE PART OF THE OVERALL PROBLEM.
IF YOU CAN’T FOLLOW
THE RULES, GET OFF THE AIR. GO AWAY! NOBODY IS IMPRESSED WITH YOUR 4-LETTER
VOCABULARY. IF YOU WANT TO EXPERIMENT WITH THE 7-WORDS YOU CAN’T SAY ON TV,
DON’T BE DOING IT ON THE HAM BANDS. GO TALK DIRTY TO YOUR GIRL FRIEND – IF YOU
HAVE ONE. WE DON’T WANT TO BE HEARING ANY MORE OF YOUR FOUL ‘FUCK’
LANGUAGE ON THE AIR AGAIN. YOU GOT THAT?
HEY, IF YOU’RE
MAN ENOUGH, HERE’S A “THANK YOU” UP
FRONT. IF YOU CAN’T OR WON’T ACCEPT THIS FRIENDLY ADVICE, THEN YOU’RE A LOT
DUMBER THAN WE THOUGHT.
WE’RE ALL ABOUT
CLEANING UP THE MESS ON 3840… AND THAT MEANSEVERY PARTICIPANT.
IF YOU’RE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION, THEN YOUARE STILL PART OF THE
PROBLEM.
73/JOHN
W A 7 B Z I
________________________
Dear Mr. Prukop: I read the emails that you sent
to Frank ******* and Laura Smith, in which you accused me of jamming. I just
wanted to tell you that I don't jam. I am a very good operator, and have been a
ham far longer than you have. I am going to keep operating my station just the
way I have been doing. I am not going to make any changes in my operating
practices.
Thank you for reading.
Bill *********, W6WBJ
-----------------------------
Dear Ms. Smith: I just read your hugely
entertaining email exchange with Frank ******* yesterday, in which you ask him
if he is interfering with "the Net". I just wanted to let you know
that there is no such thing as "the Net" on ham radio. There are a great
number of so-called "nets". Most or all of them claim to be
performing some kind of public service, but in reality they do not do so. They
claim this only because they want to make a priority claim to the frequency and
run off anybody they don't happen to like.
In this regard, please see the report of Raymond A. Kowalski, a former FCC
Official and attorney (who is now employed by the law firm of Eckert Seamans
Cherin and Mellot, LLC in Washington, D.C.), concerning his investigation into
the interference claims of the California amateur radio association, or
"net", known as "WESCARS" on the 40-meter amateur band;
commonly known as "the Kowalski report".
Please remember that Part 97 establishes
identical operating rights and privileges for all licensees of a given class.
It doesn't permit a certain group of hams to declare a frequency off-limits to
other hams, and it is not significant that they may choose to call themselves a
"net" because it is strictly a self-serving denomination.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Bill *******, W6WBJ
